MOA vs MIL Rifle Scopes (2025 Mega Guide): What They Mean, How They Work, and Which One You Should Buy
Quick Take
-
MOA (Minute of Angle) ≈ 1 inch per 100 yards (technically 1.047”). Great if you think in inches/yards.
-
MIL (Milliradian) ≈ 3.6 inches per 100 yards / 10 cm per 100 meters. Great if you think in decimals/meters.
-
Neither is “more accurate.” They’re just different rulers for the same angular corrections.
-
Consistency wins: Don’t mix a MIL reticle with MOA turrets. Pick one system and stick with it.
-
Hunters often pick MOA; PRS/military/long-range shooters often pick MIL. Your call—just be consistent.
Table of Contents
- Introduction
- MOA — Explained
- MIL — Explained
- Side-by-Side Comparison
- Pros & Cons
- What Should You Choose?
- Common Mistakes
- Models & Picks
- Comparison Tables
- Zeroing & Holds
- Training Plan
- FAQ
- Sources
MOA and MIL, Explained
Picture this: you’re on the bench, first shot is low and right. Your spotter says, “Up one MOA, left half.” If your turrets click ¼ MOA per click, that’s four clicks up and two clicks left. At 100 yards, 1 MOA ≈ 1 inch, so you just moved your point of impact about 1 inch up and ½ inch left. Easy, right?
Now imagine your spotter speaks in MILs: “Up 0.3, left 0.2.” Most MIL turrets move 0.1 MIL per click, so that’s 3 clicks up and 2 clicks left. At 100 yards, 0.1 MIL ≈ 0.36 inches (about ⅓ inch). Decimal math, tight adjustments.
Bottom line: MOA and MIL are just angular units (like inches vs centimeters on a tape). Neither kills more deer, punches tighter groups, or magically shrinks the wind. You do.
The Math
-
MOA
-
1 MOA = 1/60th of a degree
-
At 100 yards: 1 MOA ≈ 1.047 inches (everyone rounds to 1”)
-
At 200 yards: ≈ 2” | at 500: ≈ 5” | at 1000: ≈ 10.47”
-
-
MIL (MRAD)
-
1 MIL = 1/1000 of a radian
-
At 100 meters: 1 MIL = 10 cm
-
At 100 yards: 1 MIL ≈ 3.6 inches
-
Common turret: 0.1 MIL per click (≈ 0.36” @ 100 yds)
-
Conversion:
-
1 MIL ≈ 3.438 MOA
-
1 MOA ≈ 0.291 MIL
You don’t need to memorize conversions. Pick a system and live in it.
Side-by-Side: MOA vs MIL
Feature | MOA | MIL (MRAD) |
---|---|---|
Base unit | 1/60th of a degree | 1/1000 of a radian |
100 yards | 1 MOA ≈ 1.047″ | 1 MIL ≈ 3.6″ |
100 meters | ~2.9 cm | 10 cm |
Common turret | ¼ MOA (0.25 MOA) | 0.1 MIL |
Typical users | Hunters, U.S. inch/yard shooters | PRS, military, metric shooters |
Math feel | Inches at 100 yds | Decimals (tenths) |
MOA vs MIL: Pros & Cons
MOA — Pros
- Intuitive if you think in inches/yards
- ¼ MOA clicks feel very “fine” for zeroing
- Huge ecosystem (hunting scopes, charts, reticles)
MOA — Cons
- Less common in PRS/military training dialogs
- Decimals + fractions can mix (¼ MOA, 1.047″)
- Reticle subtensions sometimes feel “busy” across power
MIL — Pros
- Decimal “tenths” are fast for mental math
- Common language in PRS, mil/LE, and metric ranges
- Reticles with 0.2/0.5 subtensions are great for holding
MIL — Cons
- Inch/yard shooters must adjust to 3.6″/100y “feel”
- Some hunting scopes don’t offer MIL options
- Mixing MIL reticles with MOA turrets = pain
What Should You Choose?
Hunters (deer/elk/varmint): MOA usually feels natural. Zero at 100, learn your drops in MOA, call wind as “¾ MOA.”
PRS/Field matches/Long-range steel: MIL is the lingua franca. Spotters talk in tenths. Stage briefings are MIL-centric.
New shooters: Either works—pick the ecosystem you’ll train in. If your mentors/club call in MIL, go MIL. If your crew is inch/yard, go MOA.
Rule #1: Don’t mix reticle and turrets in different systems. Match-match-match.
Common Mistakes (and Easy Fixes)
-
Mixing systems (MIL reticle, MOA turrets) → Fix: Buy matching or replace one component.
-
Using exact 1.0″ for MOA at 100y → It’s 1.047″. At hunting ranges it’s fine to round, but be aware.
-
Dialing when holding would be faster → Learn your reticle holds for speed stages.
-
No dope card → Print a dope card in your unit; keep one in MOA or MIL (not both).
Best MOA Scopes on Amazon (2025)
(All products commonly available on Amazon; use the search links below and add your affiliate tags. Prices typically $300–$3,000+.)
Vortex Viper PST Gen II 5-25×50 — MOA
Why it’s great: Rock-solid mid/high-tier optic with reliable turrets and crisp glass; huge user base, tons of support.
Pros
- ¼ MOA turrets track reliably
- Good glass for the money
- FFP options available
- Excellent warranty
Cons
- Heavier than some peers
- Illumination is usable, not dazzling
Leupold VX-3HD 4.5-14×40 CDS-ZL — MOA
Why it’s great: Lightweight hunting glass with Leupold durability and a custom dial system (CDS) that keeps MOA life simple in the field.
Pros
- Excellent tracking reputation
- Massive elevation range
- Great for steel to 1,000+
Cons
- Large & heavy
- Overkill for casual woods hunters
Bushnell Match Pro ED 5-30×56 — MOA
Why it’s great: A value-punching competition scope with ED glass, good turrets, and thoughtful reticles.
Pros
- Strong price-to-performance
- ED glass is noticeably crisp
- Tons of user data out there
Cons
- Heavier chassis
- Turret feel is good, not elite
Vortex Diamondback Tactical 6-24×50 FFP — MOA
Why it’s great: Budget-friendly entry into FFP/MOA with repeatable adjustments and a reticle that teaches holds.
Pros
- Affordable but capable
- FFP reticle for real-world holds
- Good warranty & support
Cons
- Glass is “good” at price; not premium
- Big & a bit heavy
Best MIL Scopes on Amazon (2025)
Vortex Razor HD Gen II 4.5-27×56 — MIL
Why it’s great: Match-proven, bomb-proof, elite glass and reliable turrets—common on PRS lines for a reason.
Pros
- Top-tier tracking
- Excellent glass & eyebox
- Mil-friendly reticles
Cons
- Heavy
- Premium price
Athlon Ares ETR UHD 4.5-30×56 — MIL
Why it’s great: Big performance for the money, UHD glass, competition-ready reticles in MIL.
Pros
- Serious value buy
- Good turrets, solid tracking
- UHD glass at mid price
Cons
- On the heavier side
- Illumination is fine, not fancy
Primary Arms PLx 1-8×24 FFP — MIL
Why it’s great: Excellent reticle design (like Athena or Apollo), robust construction, and a growing PRS footprint.
Pros
- FFP ACSS Griffin MIL reticle = fast CQB, precise holds
- Premium ED glass; bright, crisp sight picture
- Light (~17 oz) and compact for a PLx-class optic
- Excellent 1× “red-dot-like” usability
- Durable 30 mm tube; throw lever included
Cons
- LPVOs trade max magnification for speed (tops at 8×)
- Eye box tightens as you approach 8× (typical of LPVOs)
- Priced above entry-level glass (premium tier)
Bushnell Elite Tactical DMR3 3.5-21×50 — MIL
Why it’s great: Popular on gas guns/bolt guns for a reason—compact for the magnification range with trustworthy turrets.
Pros
- Short/handy for its class
- Proven tracking
- Great on .308/6.5CM gas guns
Cons
- 50mm objective less bright at dusk vs 56mm
- Fewer reticle choices than some
Vortex Diamondback Tactical 6-24×50 FFP — MIL
Why it’s great: Budget entry to MIL with FFP reticle—perfect starter to learn tenths without breaking the bank.
Pros
- Affordable, MIL/FFP in one package
- Decent glass for class
- Great warranty & aftermarket knowledge
Cons
- Turret feel is “okay”
- Weight/bulk on smaller rifles
Model Comparison Tables
MOA Picks
Scope | Reticle/Turret | Click Value | Weight | Best For | Amazon |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vortex Viper PST Gen II 5-25×50 | FFP/SFP, MOA reticles | ¼ MOA | ~31+ oz | Long-range, PRS-curious hunters | Search |
Leupold VX-3HD 4.5-14×40 | SFP, MOA | ¼ MOA | ~15 oz | Hunting, lightweight rigs | Search |
Burris XTR III 5.5-30×56 | FFP, MOA tree options | ¼ MOA | ~29–32 oz | Steel & comps beyond 1,000 | Search |
Bushnell Match Pro ED 5-30×56 | FFP, MOA | ¼ MOA | ~36 oz | Value-driven competition | Search |
Vortex Diamondback Tactical 6-24×50 | FFP, MOA | ¼ MOA | ~24–26 oz | Budget long-range starter | Search |
MIL Picks
Scope | Reticle/Turret | Click Value | Weight | Best For | Amazon | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vortex Razor HD Gen II 4.5-27×56 | FFP, MIL reticles | 0.1 MIL | ~48 oz | PRS, elite long-range | Search | |
Athlon Ares ETR UHD 4.5-30×56 | FFP, MIL tree | 0.1 MIL | ~36 oz | PRS starter, value long-range | Search | |
Primary Arms PLx 1–8×24 | FFP, ACSS Griffin MIL M8 | 0.1 MIL | ~16.95 oz | AR LPVO: CQB speed to mid-range | Search | |
Bushnell Elite Tactical DMR3 3.5-21×50 | FFP, MIL | 0.1 MIL | ~34 oz | Compact long-range builds | Search | |
Vortex Diamondback Tactical 6-24×50 | FFP, MIL | 0.1 MIL | ~24 oz | Budget MIL learner’s scope | Search |
Real-World Zeroing & Holds (Walk-Throughs)
Scenario 1 – MOA zero:
-
Rifle: .308 Win, 100-yard zero.
-
First group = 2” low, 1” right.
-
Correction: Dial +2 MOA up, -1 MOA left. That’s 8 clicks up, 4 clicks left on ¼ MOA turrets.
Scenario 2 – MIL zero:
-
Rifle: 6.5 Creedmoor, 100-yard zero.
-
Group = 3.6” low, 1.8” left.
-
Correction: Dial +1 MIL up, +0.5 MIL right. That’s 10 clicks up, 5 clicks right on 0.1 MIL turrets.
👉 Both get you to the same point of impact. The math changes, not the physics.
Training Plan: Get Fluent in Your System
-
Print a dope card in your unit (MOA or MIL) — tape it to your stock.
-
Practice holds, not just dialing. PRS stages reward speed.
-
Range buddy system: Make sure your spotter speaks the same “language.”
-
Apps: Ballistic AE, Strelok Pro, Hornady 4DOF let you choose MOA/MIL and learn faster.
FAQ
Q: Which is more accurate, MOA or MIL?
Neither. They’re both angular units. Accuracy depends on glass, turret quality, and the shooter.
Q: Can I convert MIL to MOA easily?
Yes. 1 MIL ≈ 3.438 MOA. 1 MOA ≈ 0.291 MIL. But conversions slow you down. Pick one system.
Q: Should hunters use MIL?
Hunters can use either. MOA feels natural for “inches at yards,” but MIL can be better for rangefinding and wind calls in decimals.
Q: Can I run a MIL reticle with MOA turrets?
Technically yes, practically no. It’s confusing and will cost you hits. Always match.
Final Thoughts
MOA vs MIL is not a fight—it’s a translation issue. Both will put meat in the freezer, steel ringing at 1,000, or protect your crew.
-
If your hunting buddies call in inches, go MOA.
-
If your PRS squad calls in tenths, go MIL.
-
If you’re new: pick what your mentors and gear support.
Consistency is king. Choose your ruler. Learn it. Shoot it. Own it.